On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> The ini file format is not flexible enough, IMNSHO. If we're going to adopt
> a new config file format it should have these characteristics, among others:
>
> well known (let's not invent a new one)
> supports hierarchical structure
> reasonably readable
The ini format meets all of those requirements - and it's certainly
far more readable/editable than XML and friends.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
