On 09/22/2010 04:54 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> The ini file format is not flexible enough, IMNSHO. If we're going to adopt
>> a new config file format it should have these characteristics, among others:
>>
>> well known (let's not invent a new one)
>> supports hierarchical structure
>> reasonably readable
> The ini format meets all of those requirements - and it's certainly
> far more readable/editable than XML and friends.
>
No, it's really not hierarchical. It only has goes one level deep.
cheers
andrew
