On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Um, none of the fields I've suggested so far was "connection string".
> In fact, that would be Pretty Darn Hard without modifying the client
> to actually *send* the connection string. Which id doesn't.
So... is there centralized structure which contains the info you're
thinking of exposing?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
