On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.
>
>> Agreed.
>
>> What about the messages in configure?
>> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL
>> from CVS nor"
>
> I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but
> if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch.
Ok. I'll see - I need to get an old version of autoconf going too - I
somehow managed to wipe the one I have, and Ubuntu ships with a
different version :-)
I take the lack of comment on the patch itself as silent approval, so
I'll go look at backporting it soon.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
