On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I'd pick pg_execute_from_file() and just plain pg_execute(), myself.
>
> For the record there's only one name exposed at the SQL level. Or do you
> want me to expand the patch to actually include a pg_execute() version
> of the function, that would execute the query in PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0)?
No, not particularly.
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> What did you think of "pg_execute_sql_file"?
>>
>> That, I like.
>
> Ok, I call pg_execute_sql_file() the winner and will prepare a new patch
> later tonight, now is comute time.
Sounds good.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
