Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'd pick pg_execute_from_file() and just plain pg_execute(), myself.
For the record there's only one name exposed at the SQL level. Or do you
want me to expand the patch to actually include a pg_execute() version
of the function, that would execute the query in PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0)?
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> What did you think of "pg_execute_sql_file"?
>
> That, I like.
Ok, I call pg_execute_sql_file() the winner and will prepare a new patch
later tonight, now is comute time.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
