On 9 Aug 2013, at 7:09 PM, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> Uhm...I guess the problem is not about the txid being included or not:
> the recovery target was 75634 and the transaction 75666 appeared, so
> the problem seems to be an out-of-order commit of the transactions. In
> such case making the inclusive false will not cause 75666 to appear if
> it has committed before the target xid, or am I wrong?
Hi,
Is there a way to query the master (it is up and running) about the actual commit sequence by transaction IDs?
regards
