Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrus
Subject Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
Date
Msg-id A44943E272DF48CC9BC306C513387020@andrusnotebook
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
List pgsql-performance
Alvaro,

> Are you really using vacuum_cost_delay=2000?  If so, therein lies your
> problem.  That's a silly value to use for that variable.  Useful values
> are in the 20-40 range probably, or maybe 10-100 being extremely
> generous.

Thank you.
My 8.1.4 postgresql.conf does not contain such option. So vacuum_cost_delay
is off probably.
Since doc does not recommend any value, I planned to use 2000

Will value of 30 allow other clients to work when VACUUM FULL is running ?

Uncommented relevant values in postgresql.conf file are:

shared_buffers = 15000
work_mem = 512
maintenance_work_mem = 131072
fsync = on
effective_cache_size= 70000
log_min_duration_statement= 30000

Andrus.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds