Re: Barman versus pgBackRest - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Date
Msg-id 9c69ec56-d094-e4e7-d7ab-f2ae6652604a@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Barman versus pgBackRest  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
List pgsql-general
On 09/04/2018 07:14 AM, Ron wrote:
>
> That was about barman, in the barman group.  This is asking about 
> pgbackrest...  :)
>
> So: does pgbackrest have this ability which barman does not have? The 
> "--db-include" option seems to indicate that you can restore a single 
> db, but does indicate whether or not you can rename it.

https://pgbackrest.org/configuration.html#section-restore/option-db-include

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
***  A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is.  ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Next
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: Barman versus pgBackRest