Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
Date
Msg-id 9EB50F1A91413F4FA63019487FCD251D113335@WEBBASEDDC.webbasedltd.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations  (tzirechnoy@hotpop.com)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Tom,

I didn't post the sources to the list originally as I wasn't sure if the
topic were of enough interest to warrant a larger email. I've attached the
two corrected programs as a .tar.gz - crctest.c uses uint32, whereas
crctest64.c uses uint64.


Kind regards,

Mark.

------------------------
WebBased Ltd
17 Research Way
Plymouth
PL6 8BT

T: +44 (0)1752 797131
F: +44 (0)1752 791023
W: http://www.webbased.co.uk


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 16 May 2005 15:01
> To: Mark Cave-Ayland (External)
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
>
>
> "Mark Cave-Ayland" <m.cave-ayland@webbased.co.uk> writes:
> > Sigh, so it would help if I had added the offset to the data
> > pointer... ;)
>
> Would you post the corrected program so people can try it on
> a few other architectures?  No point in reinventing the
> wheel, even if it is a pretty trivial wheel.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Bjorklund
Date:
Subject: Re: SO_KEEPALIVE
Next
From: "Jeffrey W. Baker"
Date:
Subject: Re: bitmap scans, btree scans, and tid order