Re: citext operator precedence fix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: citext operator precedence fix
Date
Msg-id 9B80A980-E9B5-4DFB-892C-CED72FAA0636@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: citext operator precedence fix  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: citext operator precedence fix
List pgsql-hackers
On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:

>> No, because if 1.1 was installed on 8.4, you'd need the commands
>> to move all its functions into the extension, not re-create them.
>
> Shouldn't a version installed on 8.4 be installed as "unpackaged"?
> Doesn't citext--unpackaged--1.0.sql contain the commands to move all
> its functions into the extension?

It contains everything need to move 1.0 functions into the extension. If Josh adds new functions they obviously would
notbe moved. So a new script would need to move them. And unpackaged--1.1 does not first run unpackaged--1.0. 

Best,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: citext operator precedence fix
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: citext operator precedence fix