"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Hmm, if there's a citext--unpackaged--1.0.sql and also
>> citext--1.0--1.1.sql, is it really necessary to have
>> citext--unpackaged--1.1.sql? Shouldn't the upgrade facility be
>> able to just run both scripts?
>
> No, because if 1.1 was installed on 8.4, you'd need the commands
> to move all its functions into the extension, not re-create them.
Shouldn't a version installed on 8.4 be installed as "unpackaged"?
Doesn't citext--unpackaged--1.0.sql contain the commands to move all
its functions into the extension?
-Kevin
