-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 20:55:07 +0100 Magnus Hagander
<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Uh, what? You'd need to check the *sender*, not the recipient? At least
> that's where this thread started...
> But yeah, that would also work, as long as there is a good way to
> maintain that list. Shouldn't be too hard to do, but I'm unsure how it
> would interface with the hub.org mail infrastructure. Marc?
You've lost me here ... how would wnat interface? This is all done internal to
Majordomo2 ... nothing to do with the mail system itself ...
> That said, I still think we should check the recipient of the email on
> all MXes, but that's a completely different thing that has also been
> discussed before. (We do check them on the listserver)
We've been checking recipient on all MXs since it was discussed last time
*scratch head* Or am I missing something ... ?
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHTINJ4QvfyHIvDvMRAoeiAJ91uifWG6JiBk8ihOgQlkJFVpM+AQCfeRDu
cofTbtivxnUOCOTqTuyvpgg=
=FnR4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
