On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 11:47 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what you're saying here. In your enhanced world, if
> I
> > > send an email from alvherre@postgresql.org to a pg list and relay
> > > it through a Command Prompt server, will it bounce?
> >
> > Yes. Unless the commandprompt server is configured to use SMTP AUTH
> > (which in the case of cmd could be an exception, but it can't be the
> > rule of course)
>
> Oh so you are saying that commandprompt.com would actually auth to
> @hub.org for that particular case?
>
> I think this is a seriously bad idea... too many people auth in
> different ways. Sometimes I auth through different boxes depending on
> the environment etc...
Like I said, I'm aware that a lot of people don't like the idea :-)
> > And yes, I'm aware that quite a number of people won't like that, but
> > doing similar things cuts a *lot* of spam at other sites I manage.
> >
>
> Well I would prefer to see a trigger that checks the recipient against
> known users and aliases. If it doesn't match it is immediately bounced
> and we never see it.
Uh, what? You'd need to check the *sender*, not the recipient? At least
that's where this thread started...
But yeah, that would also work, as long as there is a good way to
maintain that list. Shouldn't be too hard to do, but I'm unsure how it
would interface with the hub.org mail infrastructure. Marc?
That said, I still think we should check the recipient of the email on
all MXes, but that's a completely different thing that has also been
discussed before. (We do check them on the listserver)
//Magnus
