--On Friday, August 08, 2003 11:53:34 +0100 Lee Kindness
<lkindness@csl.co.uk> wrote:
> I've not been keeping up with the thread re who has what version of
> getpwuid_r... But just to clarify things the "right" version is:
>
> int getpwuid_r(uid_t uid, struct passwd *pwd, char *buffer,
> size_t bufsize, struct passwd **result);
>
> documented at:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/getpwuid.html
>
> My email to Bruce which he tacked onto his reply is a good summary of
> the current problems with the thread stuff.
Ok. Lee: Did you see the patch I posted? Can you help on the configure
test(s)
needed to set HAVE_POSIX_GETPWUID_R?
I **THINK** I did the patch right to handle it if it's set. I forced it
for UnixWare
and it seems to work.
LER
>
> L.
>
> Larry Rosenman writes:
> >
> >
> > --On Friday, August 08, 2003 02:10:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian
> > <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Actually, your getpwuid_r is the old, pre-POSIX format. The attached
> > > email has the configure tests. I was hoping we wouldn't need them,
> but > > it seems we may.
> > Err, SCO claims SUSv2, the Single Unix Specification Version 2. V3
> > **JUST** came
> > out.
> >
> > I'll look at Lee's stuff.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
> > Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
> > US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
> >
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
