Larry, haven't managed to look at that patch... But stuffed for time
just now - just about to head off for the weekend. I'm hoping to spend
a bit of time on this on Tuesday! So, i'll see how things have
progressed then.
L.
Larry Rosenman writes:> --On Friday, August 08, 2003 11:53:34 +0100 Lee Kindness > > I've not been keeping up with the
threadre who has what version of> > getpwuid_r... But just to clarify things the "right" version is:> >> > int
getpwuid_r(uid_tuid, struct passwd *pwd, char *buffer,> > size_t bufsize, struct passwd **result);> >>
>documented at:> >> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/getpwuid.html> >> > My email to Bruce
whichhe tacked onto his reply is a good summary of> > the current problems with the thread stuff.> Ok. Lee: Did you
seethe patch I posted? Can you help on the configure > test(s)> needed to set HAVE_POSIX_GETPWUID_R?> > I **THINK** I
didthe patch right to handle it if it's set. I forced it > for UnixWare> and it seems to work.> > Larry Rosenman
writes:>> > --On Friday, August 08, 2003 02:10:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian> > > <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:> > > >
Actually,your getpwuid_r is the old, pre-POSIX format. The attached> > > > email has the configure tests. I was
hopingwe wouldn't need them,> > but > > it seems we may.> > > Err, SCO claims SUSv2, the Single Unix Specification
Version2. V3> > > **JUST** came> > > out.> > >> > > I'll look at Lee's stuff.
