Re: PL/pgsql or C/C++ - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ian Phillips
Subject Re: PL/pgsql or C/C++
Date
Msg-id 99112416284908.07130@Gromit
Whole thread Raw
In response to PL/pgsql or C/C++  (^chewie <chewie@wookimus.net>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Re: PL/pgsql or C/C++
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, you wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:19:53 -0600 (CST)
> From: ^chewie <chewie@wookimus.net>
> Subject: PL/pgsql or C/C++
>
> This is a general question expecting general answers.  I've read the
> documentation concerning triggers and functions, as well as the
> documentation on the different languages you can use for driving these
> triggers and functions.  Aside from portability and the lack of having
> to explicitly compiling a C/C++ library, what advantages does PL/pgsql
> have over C/C++ or even PL/tcl?
>
> ^chewie
>

Ease of use is probably the biggest plus. For running a 'quick and dirty'
trigger, it's a lot easier than compiling a C library or (in my case) learning
TCL. I suppose if you already know TCL, there isn't that much point.

 --
Ian Phillips
ian@comodo.net

"The Z80 - The Chip of the Seventies! Today!"

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Wim van den Berge
Date:
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?