Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Date
Msg-id 985a5d4d-1f55-4917-9e06-ef31f53c9ad5@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
List pgsql-hackers
On 17.03.26 14:57, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 16.03.26 16:54, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> The patch looks fine to me. While reviewing it, I noticed that the
>> function has an extra loop to count the number of variables. I don't
>> think it's needed. The count can be obtained from the list length. In
>> the attached patch, I have removed that loop. Am I missing something?
>>
>> 0001 is your patch
>> 0002 removes the loop + some cosmetic changes
> 
> committed

There are still some pg_upgrade-related failures on the buildfarm, but 
AFAICT these are not specifically from this feature but more from the 
test design of the PG_TEST_EXTRA="regress_dump_restore" test.  It looks 
like we need to drop all users at the end of 
src/test/regress/sql/graph_table_rls.sql to make this work.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
Date:
Subject: Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Return pg_control from pg_backup_stop().