Re: ssize_t vs win64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: ssize_t vs win64
Date
Msg-id 9837222c1001020729m4a6e1709uf2b47e6a8c8920d1@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ssize_t vs win64  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: ssize_t vs win64
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 16:23, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On lör, 2010-01-02 at 15:42 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> When trying to build plpython on win64, it fails because ssize_t is
>> defined differently.
>>
>> PostgreSQL has it as
>> typedef long ssize_t;
>>
>> And python has it as:
>> typedef __int64 ssize_t;
>
> What file/line is that?  I don't see that in my copies.

You mean in python? It's in  pyconfig.h, line 205 (the version
manually maintained for non-autoconf platforms). The version I have
is:
Python 2.6.4 (r264:75708, Oct 26 2009, 07:36:50) [MSC v.1500 64 bit
(AMD64)] on win32

(latest on their website as of a couple of days ago)


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: ssize_t vs win64
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ssize_t vs win64