Re: ssize_t vs win64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: ssize_t vs win64
Date
Msg-id 1262474448.3542.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ssize_t vs win64  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: ssize_t vs win64  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2010-01-02 at 16:29 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 16:23, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On lör, 2010-01-02 at 15:42 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> When trying to build plpython on win64, it fails because ssize_t is
> >> defined differently.
> >>
> >> PostgreSQL has it as
> >> typedef long ssize_t;
> >>
> >> And python has it as:
> >> typedef __int64 ssize_t;
> >
> > What file/line is that?  I don't see that in my copies.
> 
> You mean in python? It's in  pyconfig.h, line 205 (the version
> manually maintained for non-autoconf platforms). The version I have
> is:
> Python 2.6.4 (r264:75708, Oct 26 2009, 07:36:50) [MSC v.1500 64 bit
> (AMD64)] on win32

Seems kind of buggy.  They shouldn't be defining it at all.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: invalid UTF-8 via pl/perl
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: ssize_t vs win64