Re: Client application name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Client application name
Date
Msg-id 9837222c0910140944g36a69cf7y6fd8126e2feb6007@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Client application name  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: Client application name
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 18:39, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric B. Ridge <ebr@tcdi.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> A useful feature found in other DBMSs such as MS SQL Server that has
>>> been requested on these lists a few times, is the ability for a client
>>> application to report its name to the server.
>>
>> I've been following this thread closely and haven't seen mention of
>> including the setting as part of the process name, so a 'ps' (on Unix) would
>> display it. Thoughts?
>
> Isn't that cluttered enough already?

+1 for pg_stat_activity but not 'os' output.


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Client application name
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Rejecting weak passwords