On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 18:44 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 18:39, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric B. Ridge <ebr@tcdi.com> wrote:
> >> On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> >>
> >>> A useful feature found in other DBMSs such as MS SQL Server that has
> >>> been requested on these lists a few times, is the ability for a client
> >>> application to report its name to the server.
> >>
> >> I've been following this thread closely and haven't seen mention of
> >> including the setting as part of the process name, so a 'ps' (on Unix) would
> >> display it. Thoughts?
> >
> > Isn't that cluttered enough already?
>
> +1 for pg_stat_activity but not 'os' output.
+1 to output application name in pg_stat_activity and also accessible to
pg_stat_statements.
We want to be able to set the application name *after* connection, so
that session pool users can be more easily identified.
Note that this *must* be set *after* connection, not during connection.
So for me, the ability to set the application name at connection time is
a related but separate feature - and a much less valuable one at that.
ISTM much of the complexity discussed relates to this second feature.
Let's just concentrate on getting the connection-pool-identification
aspect of this done right and then maybe add second part later.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
