On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 13:31, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> Oh, hang on, "the NULL string" refers to the copy parameter? Not a
>> part of the data? I read it as "a string being NULL". Maybe something
>> like "the value of the NULL string parameter" to be overly clear for
>> people like me? :-)
>>
>
> We could change:
>
> A NULL is output as the NULL string and is not quoted, while a data value
> matching the NULL string is quoted.
>
>
> to
>
> A NULL is output as the NULL parameter and is not quoted, while a non-NULL
> data value whose text representation
> matches the NULL parameter is quoted.
>
>
> or something similar. Would that be better?
Yes, much better IMO.
-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
