Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Date
Msg-id 9837222c0908100733q6d0fb42ne27f5c7d80be4ce2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> It's been a couple of weeks now, and I've had a number of reports both
>> on-list, on-blog and in private, from people using this. I have not
>> yet had a single report of a problem caused by this patch (not
>> counting the case where there was a version mismatch - can't fault the
>> patch for that).
>
>> Given that, I say we apply this for 8.3 and 8.4 now. Comments?
>
> 8.2 as well, no?

8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv
shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I
haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a
separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first.


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows