On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>> It's been a couple of weeks now, and I've had a number of reports both
>>> on-list, on-blog and in private, from people using this. I have not
>>> yet had a single report of a problem caused by this patch (not
>>> counting the case where there was a version mismatch - can't fault the
>>> patch for that).
>>
>>> Given that, I say we apply this for 8.3 and 8.4 now. Comments?
>>
>> 8.2 as well, no?
>
> 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv
> shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I
> haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a
> separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first.
Has anyone reported the problem on 8.2?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
