Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Hickey
Subject Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)
Date
Msg-id 9810090907.ZM14542@impact1.hpcc.nectec.or.th
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] NT port of PGSQL - success  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Bruce

On Oct 8,  5:40pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have removed the data/base/*/pg_version file because it was never
> used.  We had removed the 'version' functions long ago, but
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Does this mean that the following from the FAQ is wrong?

    3.25) How do I tell what PostgreSQL version I am running?

    From psql, type select version();

If so then this question should probably be changed to point users to the
PG_VERSION file.

Just a thought

--
Sincerely,

Jazzman (a.k.a. Justin Hickey)  e-mail: jhickey@hpcc.nectec.or.th
High Performance Computing Center
National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC)
Bangkok, Thailand
==================================================================
People who think they know everything are very irritating to those
of us who do.  ---Anonymous

Jazz and Trek Rule!!!
==================================================================

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more static/NOT_USED functions
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)