Marc G. Fournier writes:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, David Gould wrote:
> > Hmmm, I have an idea, what about a Penguin?
>
> Damn linux fanatics :)
>
> We want "product identification"...the Penguin is what Linux is
> identified with, and, as we *all* know, the last thing I would want to be
> identified with :)
Off topic, but this is too good, so I am going to share anyway:
For background, the official Linux logo is a drawing of a rather plump
and distinctly non-threatening penguin known as 'Tux'.
-dg
Forwarded message:
> Subject: Re: Q: Why a penguin?
> From: C. Chan <cchan@surya.bsd.uchicago.edu>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
>
> Clive Clomsbarrow <xxx@xxx.org> wrote:
> >
> >Apparently Linus is person to blame for adopting
> >the stupid-looking thing. I guess he thought a
> >penguin would be cool (literally and figuratively).
> >I guess he deserves to get his way, even if it is
> >a demonstrable fact that marketing and engineering
> >are incompatible specialties.
> >
>
> A penguin is OK, though I'd prefer the N. hemisphere
> puffin.
>
> I think it needs more attitude though, the mascot
> looks too tame sitting on its fat duff. To really
> appeal to Americans, the penguin should have a hot
> pink mohawk, mirrorshades, an ammo belt draped about
> its shoulders, an Uzi tucked under one wing...
>
> ...and the severed head of Bill Gates under the other.
>
> --
-dg
David Gould dg@illustra.com 510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468
Informix Software 300 Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612
"Linux was made by foreign terrorists to steal money from true
AMERICAN companies like Microsoft who invented computing as we
know it, and are being punished for their success..."
