Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 966.1265222642@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> FWIW I think there's another problem with streaming replication here,
> which is that most data flows from client to server, so it would take
> quite some time for the threshold to be reached.  Note that there's no
> size check in the libpq frontend code.  Normally this is not an issue
> because the bulk of data is expected to flow in the other direction.

Huh?  I thought the slaves connect to the master, rather than the other
way round?

It's true that libpq doesn't contain any such code, but that seems like
a fortunate thing right at the moment, as it limits the number of places
we might have to hack something.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings