> On 25 Sep 2021, at 15:45, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>>> On 25 Sep 2021, at 12:03, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>>> As 9.6 will be EOL'd in a couple of weeks, is that really
>>> worth the effort though? It sounds risky to me to introduce an
>>> invasive change as that would increase the risk of bugs for existing
>>> users. So my vote would be to just let this one go.
>
>> Agreed, if it's not a simple fix it's unlikely to be worth it.
>
> Yeah, there will be no second chance to get 9.6.last right,
> so I'd vote against touching it for this.
Fair point. Should we perhaps instead include a note in the pgcrypto docs for
9.6 that 3.0.0 isn't supported and leave it at that?
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
