Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Date
Msg-id 2501018.1632577529@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 25 Sep 2021, at 12:03, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> As 9.6 will be EOL'd in a couple of weeks, is that really
>> worth the effort though?  It sounds risky to me to introduce an
>> invasive change as that would increase the risk of bugs for existing
>> users.  So my vote would be to just let this one go.

> Agreed, if it's not a simple fix it's unlikely to be worth it.

Yeah, there will be no second chance to get 9.6.last right,
so I'd vote against touching it for this.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: pgcrypto support for bcrypt $2b$ hashes
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails