Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
Date
Msg-id 9595.1131490096@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems  (Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>)
Responses Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at> writes:
> Would you mind reporting this to RedHat Bugzilla? I believe a bug report 
> from you would have more weight then mine, because you actually 
> understand what's going on here. :-)

Actually, given the thought that this may be an artifact of keeping an
intermediate value in a wider-than-normal register rather than genuinely
rearranging the computation, I'm not certain it is a compiler bug.
We'd have to study it a lot more closely before filing it as one, anyway.

If you accept the idea that the pentium4 answer is the right one,
then what we really need to do is focus on a better rounding rule than
"strict truncation".  I was toying with the notion of adding the
equivalent of half a microsecond to the fractional-day value before
truncating it to integer.  But I'm not certain that that wouldn't have
some bad effects in other cases.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Troubles with array_ref
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays