On 24.04.25 18:20, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 7:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm still content with the idea of deciding that 3.6 is now our
>> cutoff.
>
> Seems like no one is pushing hard for an earlier version, yet, so
> here's a patch with your suggested wording from upthread. I'm not sure
> if this meets Peter's request for precision. (Though I'm not really
> excited about documenting more precision than we are testing for...)
I like the change to "supported", that's useful.
I would just write 3.6 instead of 3.6.8. We've never tracked the third
version component for Python.