Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 24.04.25 18:20, Jacob Champion wrote:
>> Seems like no one is pushing hard for an earlier version, yet, so
>> here's a patch with your suggested wording from upthread. I'm not sure
>> if this meets Peter's request for precision. (Though I'm not really
>> excited about documenting more precision than we are testing for...)
> I like the change to "supported", that's useful.
> I would just write 3.6 instead of 3.6.8. We've never tracked the third
> version component for Python.
On the reading that "supported" means "we'll try to fix a problem
rather than telling you to use a newer Python", I suspect that the
correct thing to say is 3.6.8 not 3.6. There may be no difference
in practice; but if push comes to shove I don't think we'd support
a 3.6.x Python version that appears in no LTS distro.
regards, tom lane
