Re: MarkBufferDirtyHint() and LSN update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Antonin Houska
Subject Re: MarkBufferDirtyHint() and LSN update
Date
Msg-id 94901.1572630686@antos
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MarkBufferDirtyHint() and LSN update  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 9:43 AM Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> > 5. In the first session, FlushBuffer()->TerminateBufferIO() will not clear
> > BM_DIRTY because MarkBufferDirtyHint() has eventually set
> > BM_JUST_DIRTIED. Thus the hint bit change itself will be written by the next
> > call of FlushBuffer(). However page LSN is hasn't been updated so the
> > requirement that WAL must be flushed first is not met.
>
> This part confuses me. Are you saying that MarkBufferDirtyHint() can
> set BM_JUST_DIRTIED without setting BM_DIRTY?

No, I'm saying that MarkBufferDirtyHint() leaves BM_DIRTY set, as
expected. However, if things happen in the order I described, then LSN
returned by XLogSaveBufferForHint() is not assigned to the page.

--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: fe-utils - share query cancellation code
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: ssl passphrase callback