On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> The other possible option that I hesitate to suggest is Windows
>>>> Services for Unix or SUA as I think it's now called.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You mean we should post flex to that? Or have you found someone who has
>>> already?
>>>
>>
>> No idea if someone has done it already. I'm just throwing it out there
>> as an idea possibly worthy of further investigation.
>>
>
>
> Don't you need to have SUA installed to run a program built with SUA? Or are
> you suggesting we can build a distributable flex executable with SUA which
> would run standalone (as I did for 32bit Windows using Cygwin)? Requiring
> developers to install SUA would be quite a siginificant extra burden, ISTM.
The latter. And I have no idea if it's actually an option - just
throwing it out there as an idea.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
