Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Subject Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot
Date
Msg-id 9362e74e1002262252l56ab8e1cg44079c7f4384dd91@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,
    I just took the patch, but it seems to be in binary format. Can you send me the patch to me?

Thanks,
Gokul.

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Tom,
>> Is anyone interested enough to try it if I code it?

> If you're patient for results, sure.  I seem to be doing a customer
> migration or upgrade every week now, so it wouldn't take me long to have
> a test subject with a fairly complex database.

Here's a draft patch that does ordering using two lists, as I proposed.
Please test to see if it's any faster or slower than the original logic.

Note: since this changes struct TocEntry, be sure to recompile all files
in src/bin/pg_dump/ after patching.

                       regards, tom lane



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Date:
Subject: Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration