Re: better atomics - v0.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: better atomics - v0.2
Date
Msg-id 9336.1384875455@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: better atomics - v0.2  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: better atomics - v0.2  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: better atomics - v0.2  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The only animal we have that doesn't support quiet inlines today is
> HP-UX/ac++, and I think - as in patch 1 in the series - we might be able
> to simply suppress the warning there.

Or just not worry about it, if it's only a warning?  Or does the warning
mean code bloat (lots of useless copies of the inline function)?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: better atomics - v0.2
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL