Re: Request for Feedback on PostgreSQL HA + Load Balancing Architecture - Mailing list pgsql-general

On 6/18/25 18:12, vijay patil wrote:

Hi Team,

I am planning to implement a PostgreSQL High Availability (HA) and Load Balancing setup and would greatly appreciate your feedback on the architecture we've designed (see attached diagram).

Overview of the Setup:

• Two PostgreSQL nodes (VM1 and VM2) configured with:

  • Asynchronous replication from the Primary DB (on VM1) to the Standby DB (on VM2) using repmgr

  • HAProxy for failover management:

    • HAProxy 1 (active) on VM1

    • HAProxy 2 (passive) on VM2 with Keepalive for heartbeat and failover detection

  • PgBouncer on both nodes for connection pooling

• A Virtual IP (VIP) managed by HAProxy for routing traffic from the application

• Read/Write operations go to the Primary DB, and Read-Only queries can be served from either node

Objectives:

• Ensure high availability with automatic failover

• Enable basic load balancing for read-only queries

• Maintain connection pooling and routing efficiency

Request for Feedback:

• Is this architecture considered a best practice within the PostgreSQL community?

• Are there any potential bottlenecks or failure points I should be aware of?

• Would you recommend any improvements or alternative tools for achieving better reliability and performance?

Personally I will test long run via app -> pgbouncer -> pgpool-ii in order to combine :

* Query Routing (read/write automatic split)

* Load Balancing

* High Availability

* Query caching

Have you consider pgpool-ii ?  I know most support / service companies push for patroni, and manually separating read / write traffic from within the app, but I still find pgpool's query routing very nice.

• 
  

Thanks 

Vijay