Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect to a function ? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect to a function ?
Date
Msg-id 9198.1059573083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect to a function ?  (Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com>)
Responses Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect  (Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com> writes:
> What lead to degradation was the bumping off of
> effective_cache_size parameter from 1000 to 64K

Check the plan then; AFAIR the only possible effect of changing
effective_cache_size is to influence which plan the planner picks.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Date:
Subject: Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect to a function ?
Next
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect to a function ?