Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing
Date
Msg-id 9162.1442958236@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing  ("Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> In any case I think your patch is a good starting point.

The comments seemed to need some wordsmithing, but I think this is
probably basically a good idea; we've had similar complaints before
about some other equality-less datatypes, such as point.

Should we consider this HEAD-only, or a back-patchable bug fix?
Or perhaps compromise on HEAD + 9.5?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing