Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Should we add that to the opr_sanity tests?
>> Yeah, I was wondering about that too. I can imagine that someday
>> there will be prosecdef built-in functions ... but probably, there
>> would never be so many that maintaining the expected-results list
>> would be hard.
> And if it is, then we remove the test.
Right. I'll go make it so.
regards, tom lane
