Re: pg_proc.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_proc.h
Date
Msg-id 9138.1131636473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_proc.h  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> contains the following:

> /* keep the following ordered by OID so that later changes can be made 
> easier */

> which has manifestly not been followed. Should we fix the file or remove 
> the second comment?

Reordering the file into strict OID order is certainly a loser, as it'd
remove whatever semblance of logical structure remains.  However I think
the comment has some historical value.  Perhaps reword it a bit.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: win32 8.1 pgadmin dll issues
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_proc.h