Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault
Date
Msg-id 911898.1739823180@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault
List pgsql-bugs
I wrote:
> I suspect that the attached will fix it.  What I don't understand
> is why it's apparently so hard to trigger the crash, because it
> looks to me like any two successive insert commands on the same
> BRIN index should hit this.

Oh, wait: I was confusing ii_AmCache with rd_amcache in the index's
relcache entry.  This coding would absolutely not work with rd_amcache
since that's persistent.  It mostly works with the IndexInfo field
though, since an IndexInfo typically only survives per-query.
Evidently there's some path in logical replication that will re-use an
IndexInfo across multiple distinct insertion operations, and that's
what breaks it.

> BTW, I'm also a bit suspicious of the comment's claim that the
> brinDesc doesn't need cleanup.  That looks like a potential
> memory leak.

This concern still stands.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible bug ¿? missing "ucol.h" in postgre installation
Next
From: "Jose Fco. Mojada"
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible bug ¿? missing "ucol.h" in postgre installation