Re: Possible bug ¿? missing "ucol.h" in postgre installation - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jose Fco. Mojada
Subject Re: Possible bug ¿? missing "ucol.h" in postgre installation
Date
Msg-id 5f1cbb17-cda8-4514-8247-e34207a281b0@yahoo.es
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible bug ¿? missing "ucol.h" in postgre installation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Possible bug ¿? missing "ucol.h" in postgre installation
List pgsql-bugs
Hi Tom,

Thanks a lot for the fast answer !  I will try !

Thank you very much !

Regards !

Jose Mojada



El 17/2/25 a las 20:47, Tom Lane escribió:
> "Jose Fco. Mojada" <jfmojada@yahoo.es> writes:
>> As an example, we take the attempt to install the "orafce" extension in
>> the new system, although it is not the only one in which this happens.
>> When installing, we get the following error:
>>      /usr/pgsql-16/include/server/utils/pg_locale.h:19:10: fatal error:
>>      unicode/ucol.h: No such file or directory
>>          19 | #include <unicode/ucol.h>
>>             |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> On my Red Hat system, /usr/include/unicode/ucol.h is provided by
> libicu-devel.  You need to install that package, not only the
> base libicu package, to compile anything that uses libicu.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
>



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault