Re: pg_upgrade --check fails to warn about abstime - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade --check fails to warn about abstime
Date
Msg-id 910187.1695352721@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade --check fails to warn about abstime  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade --check fails to warn about abstime
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I got a complaint that pg_upgrade --check fails to raise red flags when
>> the source database contains type abstime when upgrading from pg11.  The
>> type (along with reltime and tinterval) was removed by pg12.

> Wow, I never added code to pg_upgrade to check for that, and no one
> complained either.

Yeah, so most people had indeed listened to warnings and moved away
from those datatypes.  I'm inclined to think that adding code for this
at this point is a bit of a waste of time.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: Questioning an errcode and message in jsonb.c
Next
From: "Lepikhov Andrei"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions