> On Nov 16, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-11-01 at 10:58 -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
>> It is unclear .....
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> What if we just say that OWNER TO must be done by a superuser, changing
> from one superuser to another, just like today? That would preserve
> backwards compatibility, but people with non-superuser subscriptions
> would need to drop/recreate them.
The paragraph I wrote on 11/01 and you are responding to is no longer relevant. The patch submission on 11/03 tackled
theproblem. Have you had a chance to take a look at the new design?
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
