Re: MVCC performance issue - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ben Chobot
Subject Re: MVCC performance issue
Date
Msg-id 907D81C7-6886-4DEB-9789-EE89FAD1576F@silentmedia.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MVCC performance issue  ("Kyriacos Kyriacou" <kyriacosk@prime-tel.com>)
Responses Re: MVCC performance issue  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Nov 12, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Kyriacos Kyriacou wrote:

We are still using PostgreSQL 8.2.4. We are running a 24x7 system and database size is over 200Gb so upgrade is not an easy decision!

This is why we have slony, so you can slowly upgrade your 200Gb while you're live and then only suffer a minute or so of downtime while you switchover. Even if you only install slony for the point of the upgrade and then uninstall it after you're done, that seems well worth it to me rather than running on 8.2.4 for a while.

Note there were some changes between 8.2 and 8.3 in regards to casting that might make you revisit your application.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: MVCC performance issue
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: MVCC performance issue