Martin Pihlak <martin.pihlak@gmail.com> writes:
> Now I just realized that the current patch doesn't handle this quite
> correctly. Modified patch attached.
I'm starting to look through this now, and I notice that the various
code paths in execQual.c are not too consistent about whether it counts
as a call if a strict function is skipped over because of NULL
arguments. I'm inclined to make it uniformly say that that's not a call
and is not included in the stats --- any objections?
regards, tom lane
