Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date
Msg-id 901.1264448785@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Did you happen to notice anything about pg_dump's memory
>>> consumption?
> I took a closer look, and there's some bad news, I think.  The above
> numbers were from the ends of the range.  I've gone back over and
> found that while it dropped about 2.1 GB almost immediately, cache
> usage slowly dropped throughout the dump, and bottomed at about 6.9
> GB below baseline.

OK, that's still not very scary --- it just means my off-the-cuff
estimate of 1:1 space usage was bad.  3:1 isn't that surprising either
given padding and other issues.  The representation of ArchiveEntries
could probably be made a bit more compact ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tim Bunce
Date:
Subject: Re: Miscellaneous changes to plperl [PATCH]
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Typed Table