On 24.03.23 17:58, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-03-24 11:59:23 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Another option here is to remove support for htmlhelp.
>
> That might actually be the best path - it certainly doesn't look like anybody
> has been actively using it. Or otherwise somebody would have complained about
> there not being any instructions on how to actually compile a .chm file. And
> perhaps complained that it takes next to forever to build.
>
> I also have the impression that people don't use the .chm stuff much anymore,
> but that might just be me not using windows.
I think in ancient times, pgadmin used it for its internal help.
But I have heard less about htmlhelp over the years than about the info
format.
